Why Bonds May No Longer Be Able to Save Stocks

buoys

Despite recent wobbles, U.S. large cap stocks are having a decent year, up 6% year-to-date as measured by the S&P 500 (source: Bloomberg as of 9/30/2016). This may pale in comparison to a year like 2013, but performance is more than respectable given the anemic growth and the increasingly lengthy profits recession.

The question now is whether it can continue. But to answer that, we need to look at the bond market as much as the stock market.

U.S. equities continue to be buoyed by low interest rates. Many believe this dynamic can go on, since rates are probably going to remain low, creating a still high “equity risk premium”—the likely return from stocks over bonds. Stocks, which by many measures appear expensive, are still cheap because bonds are worse, this contention holds. Although there is a theoretical appeal to this argument, the relationship between stocks and bonds is not stable and tends to be less linear when rates are this low.

A nuanced stock-bond relationship

Historically, stocks do tend to trade at higher valuations when bond yields are lower. Since 1962 the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note has explained roughly 25% to 30% of the variation in U.S. large cap equity multiples, as measured using the trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio in the chart below. The challenge for investors today is that the relationship is not linear; in other words, the relationship differs depending on the level of rates. Lower rates do indeed lead to higher equity multiples, but only up to a point: When yields get very low, as they are today, the relationship breaks down.

10y-yield-vs-sp500-valuations

In fact, there is some evidence that when yields are at very low levels, investors should be looking for higher real, i.e. after inflation, yields to confirm the equity market advance. Using yields derived from the Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) market over the past 20 years, equity multiples have been positively correlated with real long-term interest rates. For example, multiples were much higher during the boom years of the late 1990s, a period that coincided with strong growth, despite the fact that real yields were 3%-4%, roughly 10 times the post-2008 crisis average.

This nuance in the stock-bond relationship illustrates the problem of relying exclusively on yields to justify stock prices. While lower rates are generally good for stocks, there are other considerations, starting with economic growth and the factors that drive it.

Productivity matters

In particular, investors should be concerned about the low productivity the U.S. has been experiencing recently. Soft productivity suggests not only slower growth, but more pressure on companies’ margins should wages continue rising. For this reason, valuations have historically been positively correlated with the rate of productivity. But the persistently negative productivity readings of the last several quarters are consistent with multiples 10%-15% lower than they are today.

None of this necessarily suggests we are heading into a bear market. Valuations have crept even higher in many of the post-1980s bull markets. That said, low U.S. rates are not enough to constantly propel stocks higher.

Investors looking for better opportunities with less stretched valuations should reconsider international markets, particularly Japan, where multiples can still provide a lift for stocks.

Russ Koesterich, CFA, is Head of Asset Allocation for BlackRock’s Global Allocation team and is a regular contributor to The Blog.

 

Investing involves risks, including possible loss of principal. Diversification strategies do not guarantee a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of October 2016 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. BlackRock makes no representations or warranties regarding the advisability of investing in any product or service offered by CircleBlack. BlackRock has no obligation or liability in connection with the operation, marketing, trading or sale of any product or service offered by CircleBlack.

©2016 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.